Tyres in F1

I entered Formula One when 2 manufacturers were on board: Bridgestone and Michellin. Of course, being 13 years old by the time I was absolutely clueless on how tyres work, blistering, deformation, compounds, etc. When Indianapolis 2005 fiasco came in, I only knew Michellin didn’t have enough supplies to let teams run the race and so only 6 cars ran that sunday.

Now, this year I am trying to understand more and more of the sport and couple of weeks ago I was puzzled by the tyres. I know aerodynamically wheels are a big question mark and understanding them is a separate whole new world, even in CFD. However, if so in the future I will be trying to cover this aspect, now I want to focus on the sport and the choice of tyres itself. Shanghai is coming along and some time back, they compounds available for the race became known to the public. Then, when do they release the info? How do teams choose? which tyres go on qualy, which go on race? how many sets and how weather conditions affect the choice of tyres? I’d like to uncloud myself and write down useful clarifications.

Slick tyres are around since 2009 and Michellin, Bridgestone withdrew from F1 by 2010 (Michellin did it by 2007) Pirelli was then picked as the sole tyre supplier. 4 dry compounds were distinguished by colors: Hard-Silver, Medium-White, Soft-Yellow, Super soft-Red; followed by a Intermediate-Blue and Wet-Orange. All drivers making it to Q3 should keep their set of tyres used in Q3 lap to the start of the race.

2016: Drivers get 13 set of tyres each. 2 of those are allocated for the race, 1 set only for Q3. Compounds now are 5 for dry conditions adding the purple Ultrasoft. Pirelli as until now (2019 season) makes 3 of those compounds available prior each race. How they choose them? Will be covered below. Each driver can pick their own combination for the rest 10 sets of tyres as long as they choose from the pool of the 3 compounds Pirelli announced as available. Choices should be places 8 weeks before each european race and 14 weeks before other around-the-world races. When does Pirelli announces their pool? 9 weeks prior euro races, 15 weeks prior non-euro races. That means drivers get 1 week to choose since they get to know the compounds available.

The only set allocated for Q3 will be the softest compound available. The other 2 sets for the race are chosen by Pirelli and at least one must be used. Drivers who make it to Q3 should return the set they used in the qualifying session and start the race with the compound that gave them the fastest lap in Q2.

How do drivers then allocate their own tyres? The rest of the 10 sets will be used for the whole weekend. 3 Free Practices, 3 Qualifying sessions and the race. So when a driver finishes using one set, it cannot be reused and tyres will be returned at specific times.
-One set at 40min of FP1
-One set at the end of FP1
-Two sets at the end of FP2
-Two sets at the end of FP3
This leaves with 4 sets of tyres (driver’s choice), 1 set for Q3, 2 sets for race (Pirelli’s choice, at least one to be used), all those for Q1, Q2, Q3 and the race itself. The Q3 set is tricky, if the driver goes into Q3, he must use it and THEN return it, starting the race with the compound that gave him the fastest lap in Q2; however drivers not making it to Q3 can start the race with whichever compound they want, even the Q3 set that is now available.

In case of rain: drivers don’t have to use any of the mandatory race dry tyres. If race starts on a wet track, top 10 drivers don’t need to start with their Q2 set.

2018: Same as 2016 but now the range of compounds is wider. Hypersoft, ultrasoft, supersoft, soft, medium, hard, superhard. Yeah, right. Each still with its own color. Also, the 3 compounds chosen are not necessarily adjacent and one level can be skipped. Meaning “Ultrasoft-supersoft- medium” is a valid choice.

2019: Back to 5 compounds and only 3 colors per race. White is hard, yellow is medium and soft is red. Compounds are named from C1 to C5, C5 is the softest. Wet intermediate is green and evacuates 30L of water per second at 300kph. Full wet blue tyres evacuate 65L of water per second at full speed.

Now, how does Pirelli choose the compounds? Mostly the track demands and the environment (weather) are the main factors. If a circuit has a lot of high speed turns more energy will go to the tyres. The tyres (less pressed against the asphalt) because downforce will be tuned to be less to not compromise drag will gain more temperature easily, therefore harder tyres would be better.
If the circuit has a lot of straights, straights usually allow tyres to cool down, a softer compound could be needed. If the circuit has close turns or corners, less energy will go into the tyres, more grip is needed so a softer compound will be preferred.

As for the asphalt, Pirelli would look on the roughness of the track. If there is a lot of stones in the mixture of asphalt, that means the track is very grippy but damaging more the tyres. A new track or asphalt is always pointy and not even, making it more aggresive, it has more oils in the surface making it more sensitive to temperature changes and if conditions are hot the oils resurface making it more slippery. An old track is much more slick meaning there is not much grip. On the other hand, microroughness is analyzed by looking at the texture of the asphalt itself and matching it to the direct contact element: the rubber of tyre.

As for the weather, it is good to know if it’s going to rain or not (obviously), if it’s too hot or cold, if it’s dusty or sandy, if it’s a straight circuit, the time of the day at which the race will be held.

A trick then:

-Slow corners – Soft tyres
-Low tyre energy – Soft tyres
-Slow average speed – Soft tyres
-Temporary city track (is more worn) – Soft tyres

-Abrasive surface – Hard tyres
-Heavy braking – Hard tyres
-Medium/fast corners – Hard tyres
-High tyre energy – Hard tyres
-High temperatures – Hard tyres

With all this info, track and tyres for Shanghai:

If I learned this right…2 high speed straights, slow corners with a medium fast section, it looks more of a soft compound choice

😦 Pirelli chose a more medium approach compared to 2018 with Ultras-Soft and Mediums

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is image-1.png

Mid field looks safe and similar on proportion of tyre sets, however in the front runners there is a subtle play. Hamilton and Leclerc with only one set of hardest compound, I’d imagine the risk of having only one set of hards for a dominant straight circuit as China’s is high.

And that’s the entry for today!

Some links

Since this blog has a bit of everything and it also helps me to keep track of my usual things and remind me of my chase, here are some YouTube channels that I enthusiastically watch, most of them related to F1 however some are cars in general or aero in general.

Technical questions and a good overview on regulations: https://www.youtube.com/user/chainbearf1

Best channel for F1 right here below:

https://www.youtube.com/user/AUTOSPORTdotcom

Of course: https://www.youtube.com/user/Formula1

Ferrari here! https://www.youtube.com/user/ferrariworld

Great work by Mercedes explaining the behind the scenes: https://www.youtube.com/user/MERCEDESAMGPETRONAS

F1 blog https://www.youtube.com/user/seanculli

My great source of fun WTF1!!! https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDxm-FbK9nmZKqHI19j-DOw

Aero channels, well Kyle has to be here:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCh3tzzP6n5b1EWcMUpiEhXg

And also Jason has some videos related but in general it’s a bible there:

https://www.youtube.com/user/EngineeringExplained

Highlights of the week

It’s been a very tough week and even though I wanted to get some time off to write here, I used it just to switch off and rest. A very draining week has passed but I expect to catch up in the following days with some new entries.

Tomorrow is Bahrein GP and there is a big wall in the paddock saying 999th GP Countdown to 1000. I am super thrilled! Next GP is in China and well, yes, I will be there ❤ ❤ I will be able to tell I was in the 1000th GP.

Shanghai is hosting it from 12 to 14th April and I expect to get a good good show there.

This year is the year I have most closely followed F1 and it is maybe because I am more focused on the technical side and I understand better how hard is the sport, making me more of a fan. Today was Bahrein qualy and Leclerc got the first pole of his career and beat track record. Previous track record was from Vettel at 1:27:958, Leclerc shockingly made the same time for the first qualy lap on the 3rd part. How on earth can you get the same exact time?!?!?! Later, though, he beat his own time and got it faster at 1:27:866. Vettel, Hamilton and Bottas following the quite normal 2 front rows by now. Verstappen 5th, another expected outcome. Normally Red Bull follows but since Ricciardo is not there anymore and Gasly is having a hard time to get used to the car, I think Red Bull counts as 1 car for now.

Midfield, something not usually seen by the common eye, Haas had a really great qualifying with Magnussen 6th and Grosjean 8th, only separated by Carlos Sainz in 7th with the first of the Mclaren’s in the 10 first places, Norris getting P10. Raikkonen P9.

Quite cool mix up and for 2 races so far, and it’s very interesting to see results engine-wise. Teams getting Renault engine are, of course Renault and Mclaren (after a rocky situation with Honda last year). Honda having Red Bull and Toro Rosso on its side. Now, between Renault and Mclaren…looks like Mclaren has improved a lot already but not by switching the engine; perhaps Alonso might rethink his retirement and stop criticizing engines for a while?; Renault team is nowhere to be seen. On the other side, Red Bull with Honda has Verstappen high up in qualifying with a podium in Melbourne, but Toro Rosso is lost.
Red Bull is having a good driver and more effective aero than its lower branch Toro Rosso, maybe that is the only difference. Because reliability on Honda engines are not so strong even though hugs and smiles are down the podium. But then, why Renault is behind? I suppose most of the questions will be answered with more races to settle down the theories.

It was a great satisfaction to see Ferrari on top, and put away doubts and fears of them repeating Melbourne fiasco. Finally, Barcelona winter testing is proving to be right and Wolff was very serious by the end to today’s session. By neumatics choice, Mercedes is not that far behind, with soft compounds difference is not abismal, but still, strategy and engines will tell the truth tomorrow.

I am looking more on aero and to find an answer on the different approaches taken this season. Very inconclusive so far. Raikkonnen getting a P9 shows nothing and since the sport is very multidimensional, it’s very difficult to judge one performance based on one type of engineering. I do hope to write more conclusive stuff on this.

Kubica and Russell, yeah…just leave as not even getting Head out of retirement will fix this mess.

Another short thing. I started to listen to the F1 podcast (I got to know about its existence this week, terribly sad and ashamed of that). And Hamilton is on the first episode. Each podcast is around 50 min and I was very surprised to have an insight of Hamilton that went so in contrast of my opinion on him. I listened the converstation, fluid, personal, variety of topics. I liked it, I liked him, yes he has a crazy side of having his bulldog as a model…but also more mature now, has a better understanding of himself and I quite share many opinions he has. A bit I really liked and stucked in me:

“I really do truly believe that somehow you can manifest certain things that you either envision or you dream”

Lewis Hamilton

And I agree. It is true that we become somehow what we think of ourselves, at least in one tiny part. For me, that I am not a professional F1 driver making millions a year, I did dream of working at aerodynamics, I did dream of getting to F1 and I don’t know how, things just unveil themselves. We do become what we really want and that’s an amazing thing. Could be destiny, could be determination. But there is an unspeakable force out there; sorry, not out there but INSIDE us, that forge us.

I recommend the podcast. Can be found in many places but I give here the link to it via Spotify:

New aero regulations from CFD point of view

So, F1technical released a pretty good article about some CFD calculations (post processing included) to show how the aero new 2019 rules affect the car and try to evaluate from that if the claims of improving overtaking are true.

The study uses a Perinn model, something I came to learn today about its existence. Since the model is a 2017 car, halo was added in the CAD and mesh over the wheels is reduced by simplification. The whole model is simplified by reducing also the prism layers and taking into account some inaccuracies arise from skewed cells and low mesh quality.

Interesting enough, the article notices that the downforce of the wings is increased by greater surfaces now whereas underfoor lost potential due to the lack of outwashing allowing tyre wake to go down the floor.
Looking at the numbers, increasing the width of the front wing by 200 mm helps increasing 10% downforce; harder to say for the rear wing since 2 dimensions are involved in the change and it’s harder to isolate the effect. Also, wheels impact is different since flow is now directed to them, not outwashing the flow means more air reaches the rear tires and rotating tires always reduce drag compared to little or no flow, so now rear wheel drag is reduced compared to 2018.

Looking above, the generation of downforce is reduced in the 2019 car specially in the floor behind the wheel. I suspect that is because now more air goes directly to the front wheel, generating more straight wake, affecting more the edge of the floor and not having such good air to push it under, losing suction potential. And yes, that is confirmed in the following pic

A nice thing I’ve noticed is that now on the race broadcasts, you can actually see the vortex of the rear wing and this goes because the wing is taller and “stronger”, generating more strong vortices 🙂

So now the impact of the wing is higher, surely one of the aims of the regulation. Consequences: more downforce, more drag, more impact on DRS and higher wake

From my own perspective, as a viewer, I have seen more boring stages in F1, Schumacher era f.e. However now, with Melbourne already behind us, I see the closer racing; not that it’s super thrilling but yes, now cars are more able to compete not only in the midfield but also upfront (Verstappen and Leclerc cases). Didn’t notice the difference or the big improvement with the DRS working on a bigger wing, or maybe I didn’t pay enough attention, but strategies and closer racing made Melbourne fun.

Now, this study is very conservative on the geometry of the wing, having an approach more like Red Bull and Toro Rosso I would say. Would be interesting to see both ends of the spectrum and analyze the Mercedes and the Ferrari in the same way. As far as Melbourne concerns, track is quite aero dominant and Mercedes was clearly superior. Is this the answer I’m looking for? Is Mercedes approach better?

Perhaps it’s too early in the season to say anything, maybe wait for Monza; and let’s hope Wolff is right “Ferrari just didn’t have the right setup”

Bunch of material right here!

https://www.f1technical.net/features/21995?sid=f2df6130ff6d1864d6f7c162236b10f0

https://www.racecar-engineering.com/articles/formula-1-2019-aero-changes/